Here I am writing about my current research and forthcoming articles
SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS FOR WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES
Gurova Olga, Timothy Robert Merritt, Eleftherios Papachristos and Jenna Vaajakari
Wearable technologies involve the integration of technology into clothing or accessories to bring new functionalities for people on the move. Many examples of wearables are emerging from simple fitness tracking watches to electronics deeply embedded into garments for multi-touch sensing and control for personal music players. Wearables have the potential to support positive experiences in the lives of many people, however, without careful development, wearables can have a negative impact on the environment due to increased production of electronic components, increased e-waste from abandoned devices, and increased energy usage. We examine environmental sustainability issues through a review of recent research and cases across three broad areas including the fashion industry, information and communications technology (ICT), and wearable technologies. In the analysis, we examine stages in the product lifecycle and identify the unique issues for each sector including the extraction of materials, production process, distribution of products, use, and disposal of products that have reached the end of life. The findings are gathered as implications for design to offer researchers, designers, developers, and product managers an overview of the issues related to environmental sustainability and related examples of products and prototypes that have been developed to be more environmentally sustainable.
HOW THE PRACTICE OF COMMERCIALIZING COMES TOGETHER AND FALLS APART
Morozova Daria and Olga Gurova
Wearable technologies, or wearables, are a combination of design and technology—for instance, a smartwatch that measures blood pressure, or lingerie that imitates the touch of one’s lover. Regardless of initial optimistic forecasts for wearables’ market growth, there are few examples of successfully commercialized wearables, except those by technology giants like Apple or Xiaomi. In contrast to large companies, start-ups developing wearables, while numerous, struggle to survive. Previous studies on commercializing failures suggest that this is due to poor design of wearables, inappropriate business models, or an extended time lag needed for customers to accept such novel technology. In this article, we add to the ongoing discussion by approaching the commercializing process as a complex integrative practice that consists of materials, skills and meanings. Looking from this angle allows for discovering new dependencies that are otherwise left unseen. Drawing on three examples of wearable start-ups that correspond to a proto-practice, reproduced practice and ex-practice, we analyze how the practice of wearables’ commercializing takes shape, perpetuates and falls apart, what problems accompany the practice, as well as how an understanding of commercializing can go beyond a traditional interpretation of profit increase. The article is based on qualitative research among startups of wearable technologies in Finland, Russia and the Netherlands approached through a lens of the practice theory.
BEING LIKE OTHERS VERSUS BEING DIFFERENT: WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY AND DAILY PRACTICES OF CONSUMERS 50+ IN FINLAND ANF RUSSIA
Morozova Daria and Olga Gurova
This is a qualitative study of consumers aged 50+ and their daily practices connected to wearable devices (smartwatches and fitness trackers). Drawing on the practice theory, we seek to uncover how participation in such practices might enhance users’ wellbeing as an integral part of social sustainability. We assume that both ageing and wellbeing are not pre-given but they rather co-evolve when users of wearables engage in situated practices. Hence, wearables such as smartwatches and fitness trackers might positively reconfigure the existing practices of consumers over 50, or even recruit them into new ones, resulting in higher wellbeing and social sustainability. The phenomenon is examined in both Russia and Finland, as ageing has been high on the agenda in these countries due to controversial pension and social welfare reforms. Though these countries are different in terms of possibilities (access to medical help, employment, social participation, etc.) for their ageing populations, an active ageing framework that emphasises individual responsibility over one’s health and wellbeing has been gaining popularity in both Russia and Finland. This framework is compatible with the use of wearable devices that measure physical activity and basic health characteristics. Based on data elicited through 17 semi-structured interviews with Russians and Finns aged between 50 and 73 y.o., this study suggests that engagement in practices with wearables might have a positive effect on consumers’ wellbeing by helping manage one’s daily tasks, reducing stigma that is sometimes attached to ageing individuals, and boosting feeling of togetherness in social interactions that might decrease with ageing. In addition, an important difference between the two countries lies in how ageing consumers see themselves in relation to other ageing people when using a wearable: in Russia, the use of a wearable can signal one’s social distance from an “average” ageing person, while Finnish consumers regard themselves as doing what everyone of the same age does.
Gurova Olga and Annamari Vänskä (in alphabetical order)
At the end of 2010s fashion industry was shaken by incidents that brought accusation of fashion brands in lack of cultural sensitivity, cultural appropriation and racism. Among such incidents are H&M and the “Coolest monkey in the jungle” sweatshirt modeled by a black boy, Gucci and the sweater that resembles the offending image of blackface, Dior and the “Bihor Couture” collection, in which traditional Bihor clothing from Romania were used without acknowledging the inspiration. We conceptualize these incidents as ‘fashion scandals’, i.e. actions, statements or events created by fashion brands that caused strong emotional response of consumers. The aim of this paper is to look at the sociocultural meanings of the fashion scandals and make sense of them with the use of social and cultural theory and examples of the scandals.
Fashion scandals are often caused by reaction of consumers to images – marketing materials, design of material objects or advertising. Fashion advertising especially has been defined by an aim to shock the consumer and cause a scandal: we live in an era of overwhelming amount of visual information and many advertisers use shock as a strategy of grabbing attention. For these brands, using shock advertising has been a deliberate choice: to ‘offend the audience’ in order to be seen and remembered. Offense is often brought about by violating and transgressing social norms of decency, or by breaking social or moral codes of propriety. In this sense, the shocking images are more than just selling tools: they are social objects that are evaluated against the backdrop of culture; its norms, notions of good taste, moral standards and decency. Even though the use of shock effects in fashion images can be said to constitute a foundation for becoming noticed in the visualised consumer culture, recent fashion scandals reveal a shift from attention-grabbing marketing strategies towards a broader cultural change in fashion industry in which debates generated by brands have not so much to do with marketing strategies than with a broader concern with identity politics that these debates reflect in the latter part of the 2010s. In the core of many fashion scandals today, as we argue, is exactly the issue of identity politics that goes beyond the state-of-art understanding of fashion and identity. Since these attention-grabbing scandals have not led to increase in sales or contributed to the brand image as “dearing” or “cutting-edge” but rather to boycotts (e.g. D&G ad in China) and to establishing “diversity guidelines/ boards” (Gucci, Dior), we will discuss whether this connects the cultural change in fashion industry to 2010s being a “decade of identity politics” as argued by Fukuyama (2018).
IN SEARCH FOR A MONEYMAKING MACHINE:
DISCOURSES ON POLICY TOWARDS FASHION IN FINLAND
Recently, fashion has become a target for political considerations and “strategic governmentalisation” in such countries as Denmark, Australia and New Zealand, among others. Finnish government has also paid attention to fashion. This research uses the concept of ‘governmentality’ as a form of power with the purpose to understand how fashion is governed in a contemporary western society. Taking Finland as a site of fieldwork, this research shows how various governmental and non-governmental actors, aligned in fluid networks, produce policy for fashion, what rationalities lay behind their actions and what kind of dilemmas they have to address.